There’s a contingent of movie people who found the follow-up to 2009’s Star Trek to be downright bad. I’m not one of those people, but it’s hard to deny that Star Trek Into Darkness lacks a few things the original reboot had going for it. I actually mildly enjoyed J.J. Abrams’ second instalment in the series, with its genuinely strong action sequences, development of the friendship between Spock and Kirk, and a reasonably engaging use of 3D.
I share the feelings of those who found the reveal of Benedict Cumberbatch’s oh so mysterious character to be severely anticlimactic, which Abrams himself has since admitted may have been a mistake in its execution. But in addition to the dullness of this revelation, I found the inclusion of Cumberbatch and his performance to be disappointingly lackluster. Standard villainous characters are so 1990.
Continue reading on the next page…